Section 20: Penalties
दण्ड
Bill
Chapter
Section No.
Keywords
Overview
Section 20 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, deals with the punishments for breaking the rules set out in Chapter IV (Experimentation on Animals), any rules made under that chapter, or any orders given by the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals. Essentially, it specifies what happens if someone doesn't follow the law when conducting experiments on animals.
Key Provisions
- Penalties for Violations: This section empowers authorities to punish individuals or institutions that violate the provisions of Chapter IV or related rules/orders.
- No Specific Penalty Amount: The section doesn’t state a fixed fine or imprisonment term. The penalty is determined based on the severity of the violation and is decided by the court.
- Broad Scope: The penalties apply not only to direct violations of the Act but also to non-compliance with rules framed under it and directions issued by the Committee.
Practical Impact
This section affects researchers, educational institutions, veterinary practitioners, and anyone involved in animal experimentation. It ensures that those conducting experiments adhere to ethical guidelines and legal requirements. For government authorities, it provides the legal basis to prosecute offenders and enforce animal welfare standards. Citizens benefit from this section as it aims to protect animals from unnecessary suffering during scientific procedures.
Examples
- Example 1: A researcher conducts an experiment on rabbits without the necessary approval from the Committee. This is a direct violation of Chapter IV and Section 20. They could face a penalty as determined by the court, potentially including a fine and/or imprisonment.
- Example 2: A pharmaceutical company fails to maintain proper records of animal experiments as required by the rules framed under the Act. While not a direct violation of the experimentation process itself, it’s a breach of the rules made under Chapter IV. The company could be penalized for non-compliance, even if no animal was directly harmed.
📰 Related Blog Posts
Constitutional Rights vs. Public Safety: Analyzing the Supreme Court’s Delhi Stray Dog Rul...
The Supreme Court’s August 2025 directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR within eight weeks has ignited a natio...